Bituminous Membrane vs SPF Roofing

This post was written by Bruce on April 1, 2010
Posted Under: Ask The Expert,Roof Comparisons,Storm Damage

According to a recent article in SprayFoam magazine, spray foam provides a much better roof system than bituminous membrane roofing when it comes to withstanding storm damage.

Spray foam provides a continous surface wth no edges, seams or joints that is self adhering, protects from water, and resists high winds, missile damage, and penetration.

Here’s a summary of some of the differences:

Membrane Roofing SPF Roofing
Structure
Assembly Overhangs and overlaps seams and joints Continuous surface with no edges, seams, or joints
Flashings Attached flashings Self-flashing
Attachment Secured to deck with fasteners Self adhering (no fasteners)
Weather Effects
Projectiles Subject to damage and penetration Resists missile damage and penetration
Wind Can lift off or peel under high wind Grips building wall to resist high winds
Water Peeling exposes interior to water Continuous surface protects from water

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address

Next Post: